Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance among Fifth and Sixth Grade Children in Addis Ababa

  • Seleshi Zeleke

Abstract

Although a few studies have examined gender differences in mathematics achievement among Ethiopian children, no study as yet has documented these differences in relation to specific mathematics subtests. Nor has there been any study that investigated students’ relative performance on different mathematics subtests. The major objectives of this study were thus (1) to identify the mathematical skills in which boys and girls differ and (2) to examine whether the children perform equally well on three mathematics subtests. To this end, the study examined the performance of 177 boys and girls in grades five and six on subtests of mathematics computation, concepts and problem solving. The results indicated no significant differences between fifth grade girls and fifth grade boys on the three subtests. However, at the sixth grade level, boys performed significantly better than girls on the problem solving subtest. The difference on the computation subtest was also marginally significant and in favor of boys. The students in both grades performed better on the computation subtest than on the other two subtests. Overall, the findings evidenced more similarities than differences between boys and girls’ mathematics achievement. Unfortunately, weaknesses rather than strengths marked the achievement of both boys and girls.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anastasi, A. (1958). Differential Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Badger, M. E. (1981). Why Aren’t Girls Better at Maths? A Review of Research.
Educational Research, 24: 11-23.
Fennema, E. (1974a). Sex Differences in Mathematics Learning: Why? The
Elementary School Journal, 75: 183-190.
Fennema, E. (1974b). Mathematics Learning and the Sexes. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 5: 126-129.
Fennema, E. and Carpenter, T. P. (1981). Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics:
Results from National Assessment. The Mathematics Teacher, 74: 554-559.
Fennema, E. and Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics
Achievement, Spatial Visualization, and Affective Factors. American
Educational Research Journal, 14: 51-71.
Fennema, E. and Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics
Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 9: 189-203.
Fox, L. H. (1981). The Problem of Women and Mathematics. New York: Ford
Foundation.
Hilton, T. L. and Berglund, G. W. (1974). Sex Differences in Mathematics Achievement
- A Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Educational Research, 67: 231-237.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. and Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender Differences in Mathematics
Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2): 139-155.
Lummis, M. and Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender Differences in Beliefs and Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Study. Developmental Psychology, 26(2): 254-263.
Maccoby, E. E. (1966). Sex Differences in Intellectual Functioning. In E. E. Maccoby
(ed.), The Development of Sex Differences (pp. 24-55). Stanford, California:
Stanford University Press.
Marshall, S. P. (1984). Sex Differences in Children's Mathematics Achievement:
Solving Computations and Story Problems. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 76: 194-204.
Seleshi Zeleke (2000). Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement: A Search for Explanations. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 12 (1): 100-118.
Seleshi Zeleke (2001). Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance in the Elementary Grades: Implications for Women’s Participation in Scientific and
Technical Occupations. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review,XVII (2): 109-127.
Sherman, J. (1980). Mathematics, Spatial Visualization, and Related Factors: Changes
in Girls and Boys, Grades 8-11. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72: 476-482.
Zambo, R. and Follman, J. (1994). Gender-Related Differences in Problem Solving
at the Sixth and Eighth Grade Levels. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(2): 20-38.
Published
2005-06-01