Active Learning Strategies Utilization and the Surrounding Dilemma in Ethiopian Public Universities
Abstract
This study was conducted on 304(260 males and 44 females) Ethiopian public university teachers. Its major purposes were (1) to identify teachers‟ utilization of active learning strategies and its status (2) to assess the differences of teachers‟ active learning strategies utilization with respect to the experiences of the university, faculty type, HDP training status and professional course dosage level and (3) to examine teachers and academic officers dilemmas in the utilization of active learning strategies. The research design was a descriptive survey type. Questionnaire and interview were used to collect the required data to the study. One sample t-test, ANOVA, post Hoc mean comparison and qualitative description were used to analyze the collected data. One sample t-test showed that since all the observed means are significantly below the expected mean (3), university teachers‟ utilization of active learning strategies is in its minimal position. One way ANOVA results, however, indicated that teachers from high experienced university tended to utilize active learning strategies relatively more than the less experienced university teachers did. The same ANOVA results, on the other hand, revealed that there are no significant differences in teachers‟ active learning strategies utilization as the function of their HDP training status and professional course dosage level. The result of Post Hoc mean comparison depicted that engineering faculty teachers were relatively best of all other faculty teachers in utilizing active learning strategies and they were followed by natural science teachers. Taking group discussion as a substitution of active learning, imposing teachers to use active learning strategies regardless of examining the context, using active learning strategies mainly for social science contents, and practising agenda which are inconsistence with active learning strategies were found as the major dilemmas observed in the utilization of active learning strategies.
Downloads
References
Amare Asgedom (2000). An androgenic Approach to Teaching and Learning. IER Flambeau, 8(1), 73-88. Ambaye Tesehaye (1999). Curriculum Evaluation: Monitoring the Harmony of TTI syllabuses with the New Primary Level Curriculum Vis-à-vis Standard Models and New Education and Training Policy. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 19 (1), 1 - 28. Amera Seifu (2003). Distance Education and its Relation with Media. IER Flambeau, 11(1), 75-8. Arrends, R.I. (1994). Learning to Teach. (3rd ed). New York: Mcgraw-Hill Inc. Ayalew Shibesh, Dawit Mekonen, Tesfaye Semela and Yalew Endawoke (2009). Assessment of Science Education Quality Indicators in Addis Ababa, Bahir Dar and Hawassa Universities. In Forum for Social Studies (eds.). Quality of Higher Education in Ethiopian Public Institutions. Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies. Biggs, J. (1996). Teaching for Quality Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press. Brown, N.R., Oke, E.R. and Brown, P.D. (1982). Curriculum and Instruction: An Introduction to methods of Teaching. London: Macmillan Publisher.
Cohen, L. Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2004). A Guide to Teaching Practice. (5th ed). New York: Printice Hall. Copper, p. (1996). Effective Teaching and Learning: Teachers and Students Perspective. England: Open University press. Collis, M. and Lacy, p. (1996). Interactive Approaches to Teaching a Framework for INSENT. London: David Fulton Press. Colliver, J. (2000). Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Curricula. Academic Medicine, Vol. 75, 259-272. Cruickshank, et al. (1995). The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill, Ink. Dahlstrom, L. (1999). Towards Learner-Centered and Democratic Teacher Education. In Zeichner, K. and Dahlstrom, L. (Eds). Democratic Teacher Education in Africa: The Case of Namibia. USA: Westview Press. Doll, R.C. (1989). Curriculum Improvement: Decision Making and Process (7th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Donald, N. L. (1971). Wax and Gold: Traditional and Innovation in Ethiopian Culture. Chigago: University of Chigago Press. Duke, D.L. (1990). Teaching an Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill Pub. Comp. Friere, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Girma Amare (1967). The Aims and Purposes of Church Education. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 1 (1), 1-28.
Girma Amare. (1963). Memorization in Ethiopian Schools. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, (1), 27- 35. Haddway, P. and Igel, B. (2006). Fostering Innovation in Higher Education. Thiland: Asian Institute of Technology. Haftu Hindya (2008). Teachers’ Problem Solving Conceptions and Classroom Practices. Bahir Dar: Bahir Dar university (MA Thesis). Haileyesus Wudu (2007). Constructivist Approach to Teaching: The Efforts and Challenges of Second Cycle Primary School Teachers of Bahir Dar. Bahir Dar: University (MA Thesis). Hall, K. (1995). Learning modes: An Investigation of Perceptions in Five Kent Classrooms. Educational Research. 37(1), 21-32. Howard, G. (1985). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books. Inbakon Kalewold (1970). Traditional Ethiopian Church Education. New York: Teachers‟ College Press. Johnston, S. (1994). Experience is the Best Teacher, or is it? An Analysis of the Role of Experience in Learning to Teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3). 199-208. Kelly, A.V. (2004). The Curriculum Theory and Practice (5th eds). London: Sage Publications). Lott, G. (1983). The Effect of Inquiry Teaching and Advance Organizers upon Student Outcomes in Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 20, 437-453.
Mayer, R.E. (1994). Problem Solving and Thinking, Developing of Learning Skills Programs. In the T. Hussen and N.T. Postlethwaite (eds) International Encyclopedia of Education. MoE (1994). The New Education and Training Policy. Addis Ababa: MoE. MoE (2004). Higher Diploma Program for Teacher Educators Hand Book. Addis Ababa: MoE. Norman, G. and. Schmidt, H. (1993). The Psychological Basis of Problem- Based Learning: A Review of Evidence. Academic Medicine, 67 (2), 557–565. Prince, M.J. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. Prince, M.J. Felder R.M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. Rand Ayn (1991). Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Leonard Peikoff. Reda Darge (2001). Conception of Constructivist Teaching Approach in Higher Education: A case Study. IER Flambeau, 12(1), 57-62. Robert B. and Tagg J. (1995). From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Journal of Change, 27(6): 12-25. Schon, D.A. (1991). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. (2nd ed) London: Temple Smith.
Silbrman, M. (1996). Active Learning 101 Strategies to Teach any Subject. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Teheranian, M. et. al. (1997). Communications Policy for National Development. London: Rouedge and Kegan Paul Publication. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Wollffe, J. and Mcmullen, F. (1996). The Constructivist Connection: Linking Theory, Best Practice and Technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 12(2), 25-28.
Wondimagegnehu Tuji (2006). Upper Primary Students’ Engagement in Active Learning: The case in Butajira Town Primary Schools. The Ethiopian Journal of Education 26(1), 1-30.
Wossenu Yimam (2009). Higher Education Institution Teachers’ Pedagogical Training, Work Load, and performance Evaluation. In Forum for Social Studies (eds.) Quality of Higher Education in Ethiopian Public Institutions. Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies. Yalew Endawoke (2004).Teachers’ Beliefs, Knowledge and Practice of learner- centered Approach in School of Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 24(2) 17-42.
