Assessing Students in Addis Ababa University: Indian and Ethiopian Faculty Members’ Perceptions and Reflections

  • P. Mohan Raju

Abstract

Professors can play an important role in the lives of students in higher education. Generally speaking, training students in higher level cognitive skills is the focus and purpose of higher education, and the assessment of students with appropriate tools is as important as imparting instruction and developing capabilities. In the context of massification of higher education in the country, on 3 issues related to assessment of students in Addis Ababa University (AAU), the views of faculty members were solicited. The sample included 52 Indian faculty members, and 24 Ethiopian faculty members. Among the sample participants, 85% Indian and 68% Ethiopian faculty members felt that the students need to develop the skills of writing long descriptive and explanatory answers, whereas 73% Indian and 62% Ethiopian faculty member felt that students generally have mistrust in any faculty member during evaluation, and students’ reaction to evaluation is unjustified. The paper argued for improving standards, removing the mistrust and developing the students’ skills in writing long answers. Maintaining examinees’ confidentiality and using external examination are suggested as useful tools in this context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexitch, L. & Page, S. (1997). Faculty Members’ Attitudes and Perceptions about the Quality of University Education: An Initial Exploration. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(1), 82-88.
Bizzell, P. and Singleton, R.Jr. (1988). What can We do about Essay Exams? Teaching Sociology, 16, 177-179.
Dickson, V. (1984). An Economic Model of Faulty Grading Practices. Journal of Economic Education, 14, 197-203.
Entwistle,N., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. In Jackson, M.W. Skimming the Surface or Going Deep? Political Science and Politics, (1995). 28 (3), 512-514.
Faulconer, J.E., Williams, R.N. and Packard, D.J. (1988). Using Critical Reasoning to Teach Writing. Teaching Philosophy, 11, 229-244.
Kolevzon, M.S. (1981). Grade Inflation in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 195-212.
Leathwood, C. and Phillips, D. (2000). Developing Curriculum Evaluation Research in Higher Education: Processes, Politics and Practicalities. Higher Education, 40(3), 313-330. McKenzie, R.B. (1975). The Economic Effects of Grade Inflation on Instructor Evaluations: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Economic Education, 6 (2), 99-106.
Nelson, J.P., and Lynch, K.A. (1984). Grade Inflation, Real Income, Simultaneity, and Teaching Evaluations. Journal of Economic Education, 15(1), 21- 37.
Pascarella, E.T. (1984). College Environmental Influences on Students’ Educational Aspirations. Journal of Higher Education, 55, 751-771.
Scriven, M. (1975). Evaluation Bias and its Control, (Occasional Paper No.4), Kalamazoo.
Stake, R.E. & Gjerde, C. (1974). An Evaluation of TCITY. In Nevo, D. (1983). The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: An Analytical Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(1), 117-128
Stufflebeam, D.L. et al. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. In Nevo, D. (1983). The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: An Analytical Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(1), 117-128.
Western Mishigan Univerity. In Nevo, D. (1983). The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: An analytical Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(1), 117-128.
Zangenehzadeh, H. (1988). Grade Inflation: A Way out. The Journal of Economic Education, 19(3), 217-226.
Published
2007-06-02