A Look at Cognitive Temp,: Review With Commentary
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adams, W.V. (1972). Strategy ,Differences Between Reflective and Impulsive Children. f Child DeyelQPment, 43(30),1076-1080.
Agnew, P.N. & Young, RD. (1979).Verbal Mediation, Co.~tiveTetnpo, and Self- Esteem inNonnal-Active, Hiih-Active andHyperactive Boys: [A.A.V. CDROM].
Abstract from: ERIC:ED 172915.
Ault, R.L. (1973). Problem-Solving Strategies of Reflective,Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children. Child Development, 44(2); 259-266.
Ault, RL.; Crowford, D.E. & Jeffrey,W.E. (1972). Visual Scanning Strategies of Reflective,Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children on the
Matching Familiar Figures Test.Child Development. 43(4),1412-1422.
Ault, RL.; Mitchell, C. & Hartmann,D.P. (1976). Some Methodological problems in Reflection-Impulsivity Research.Child Development, 47(9), 227-231.
Barrett, D.E. (1977). ReflectionImpassivity as Predictor of Children's Academic chievement. Child Deyelopment, 48(4), 1443-1447.
Barstis, S.W. & Ford, L.H.Jr. (1977).Reflection-Impulsivity Conservation, and the Development of Ability to control Cognitive Tempo. Child .
DeyelQP1Dent,48(3), 953-959.
Block, J.; Gjerde, P.f. & Block, I.M. " (1986). More Misgivings About the Matching Familiar Figwes Test As a Measure of Reflection~ ,Impulsivity: Absence of .Construct Validity in 'Preadolescen DeveloPmental PsycholoiY, 22(6), 820-831. Carroll, lA. (1977). The Effects of Cognitive Tempo on Cue Selection Strate~es of YoW1~ Children. 1. A.A. V. CDROM]. Abstract from: ERIC:ED 242436. Davidson, W.B. (1982). Multi method Examination of Field Dependence and Impulsivity. Psychological Reports. 50(2), 655-661. Denney, D.R (1972). Modeling Effects Upon conceptual Style and Cognitive Tempo. Child Development. 43 (1), 105-119.
Dillon, R.F. and Donow, C. (1982). The Psychometric Credibility of the Zelniker and Jeffrey Modification of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Educational and
Psychological Measurement. 42(2), 529-536.Egeland, B. & Weinberg, RA. (1976).he Matching Familiar Figures Test~ A look at Its sychometric Credibility. Child
Deyelopment, 47(2), 483-497.
Genshaft, 1.L. cl Hilt, M. (1979). Race Effects in Modifying Cognitive Impulsivity through SelfInstruction and Modeling. Joumal of ExPCrimental Child
PsycholoiY. 27(1), 185-194.
Gow, L. & Ward, J. (1982). Extension of the Use of Measures of Cognitive Style to Moderately-Severely Retarded Trainees in a Field Setting.[A.A.U. CD- ROM]. Perceptyal and Motor Skills.. 55(1), 191-194. Abstract from:ERIC: ·EJ 269301.
Gulo, D.F. (1988). An Investigation of Cognitive Tempo and Its Effects on Evaluating Kindergarten Children's Academic and Social Competencies. [A.A.U. CDROM].Early Child Development and Care. 34, 201-215. Abstract from: ERIC: EJ385959.
Zelniker, T.; Jeffrey, W.E.; Ault, R. & Parsons, J. (1972). Analysis and Modification of Search Strategies of Impulsive and Reflective Children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Child Development. 43, 321-335.
Agnew, P.N. & Young, RD. (1979).Verbal Mediation, Co.~tiveTetnpo, and Self- Esteem inNonnal-Active, Hiih-Active andHyperactive Boys: [A.A.V. CDROM].
Abstract from: ERIC:ED 172915.
Ault, R.L. (1973). Problem-Solving Strategies of Reflective,Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children. Child Development, 44(2); 259-266.
Ault, RL.; Crowford, D.E. & Jeffrey,W.E. (1972). Visual Scanning Strategies of Reflective,Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children on the
Matching Familiar Figures Test.Child Development. 43(4),1412-1422.
Ault, RL.; Mitchell, C. & Hartmann,D.P. (1976). Some Methodological problems in Reflection-Impulsivity Research.Child Development, 47(9), 227-231.
Barrett, D.E. (1977). ReflectionImpassivity as Predictor of Children's Academic chievement. Child Deyelopment, 48(4), 1443-1447.
Barstis, S.W. & Ford, L.H.Jr. (1977).Reflection-Impulsivity Conservation, and the Development of Ability to control Cognitive Tempo. Child .
DeyelQP1Dent,48(3), 953-959.
Block, J.; Gjerde, P.f. & Block, I.M. " (1986). More Misgivings About the Matching Familiar Figwes Test As a Measure of Reflection~ ,Impulsivity: Absence of .Construct Validity in 'Preadolescen DeveloPmental PsycholoiY, 22(6), 820-831. Carroll, lA. (1977). The Effects of Cognitive Tempo on Cue Selection Strate~es of YoW1~ Children. 1. A.A. V. CDROM]. Abstract from: ERIC:ED 242436. Davidson, W.B. (1982). Multi method Examination of Field Dependence and Impulsivity. Psychological Reports. 50(2), 655-661. Denney, D.R (1972). Modeling Effects Upon conceptual Style and Cognitive Tempo. Child Development. 43 (1), 105-119.
Dillon, R.F. and Donow, C. (1982). The Psychometric Credibility of the Zelniker and Jeffrey Modification of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Educational and
Psychological Measurement. 42(2), 529-536.Egeland, B. & Weinberg, RA. (1976).he Matching Familiar Figures Test~ A look at Its sychometric Credibility. Child
Deyelopment, 47(2), 483-497.
Genshaft, 1.L. cl Hilt, M. (1979). Race Effects in Modifying Cognitive Impulsivity through SelfInstruction and Modeling. Joumal of ExPCrimental Child
PsycholoiY. 27(1), 185-194.
Gow, L. & Ward, J. (1982). Extension of the Use of Measures of Cognitive Style to Moderately-Severely Retarded Trainees in a Field Setting.[A.A.U. CD- ROM]. Perceptyal and Motor Skills.. 55(1), 191-194. Abstract from:ERIC: ·EJ 269301.
Gulo, D.F. (1988). An Investigation of Cognitive Tempo and Its Effects on Evaluating Kindergarten Children's Academic and Social Competencies. [A.A.U. CDROM].Early Child Development and Care. 34, 201-215. Abstract from: ERIC: EJ385959.
Zelniker, T.; Jeffrey, W.E.; Ault, R. & Parsons, J. (1972). Analysis and Modification of Search Strategies of Impulsive and Reflective Children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Child Development. 43, 321-335.
