Peer Review of Instructional Practice at Colleges: A Perspective on the Professional Development of Instructors

  • Solomon Amare

Abstract

This study set out to investigate the nature and the level of cognitive complexity of questions that teachers ask in the classroom. Primarily informed by the value the concept of a "reflective practitioner" , the study involved one instructor of English who volunteered to participate in the research . The instructor's class was recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the observation technique known as "selective verbatim" which was developed by Achenson and Gall (1989) and the Taxonomy of Cognitive
Difficulty of Questions developed by Thomas Barret. Analysis of the instructor's questions revealed that he posed a total of 88 questions in an hour. Most of these (71.5%) were lower cognitive questions and only very few of them (3.4%) were real higher cognitive questions - a finding consistent with the research literature. Further analysis made by reflecting on the data secured led to some major observations and feedback. The feedback was intentionally used in the subsequent lessons and a second recording and analysis revealed the improvements in questioning techniques and the influences on the quality of classroom interaction. Finally, implications for practice and in sights with regard to professional development were drawn both from the findings and the experiences of participating in the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achenson , Keith A. (1981). Classroom Observation Techniques. Idea paper No.4. Kansas State University.
Achenson, Keith A. and Gall, Meredith Damine. (1987). Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers: Pre-service and In-service Applications. New York: Longman.
Alexander, et.al (1994) . How Subject-Matter Knowledge Affects Recall and Interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313-337.
Alexander, PA, and Judy, J.E. (1988) . The Interaction of Domain-specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
Brophy, J., and Good, T. (1986). Teacher Behavior and Student Achievement. In Mittorck.(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (PP. 328-375) . New York: Macmillan.
Cashin, W.E. (1981). Asking and Answering Questions. Idea paper No.12 Kansas State University.
Cotton , K.(2002). Classroom Questioning . www.nwrel.org/
Davis, O.L. , and Tinsley, D. (1967). Cognitive Objectives Revealed by Classroom Questions Asked by Social Studies Teachers and Their Pupils. Peabody Journal of Education , 44, 21-26 ..
Dillon, J.T. (1981). Duration of Response to Teacher Questions Statements. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, PP. 1-11 .
Fillipone, M. (1998). Questioning at the Elementary Level. Master's thesis, Kean University.
Fowler, T.W. (1975). An Investigation of the Teacher Behavior of Wait Time During an Inquiry Science Lesson. Paper Presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in science Teaching, Los Angeles.
Guszak, F.J. (1967). Teacher Questioning and Reading. The Reading Teacher,21 , 227-234.
Honea, J.M., Jr. (1982). Walt-Time as an Instructional Variable: An Influence on Teacher and Student. Clearing House, 56 (4), 167-170.
Long, M.H. and C.J.Sato (1983). Classroom Foreigner Talk Discourse: Forms and Functions of Teachers' Questions. In H.W. Seliger and M.H. Long. Rowley, Mass: classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition,ed. Newbury House.
Marzano, R.J., et. al (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works. Research-Bsed Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. ASCD.
Mueller, D.o. (1973) . Teacher Questioning Practices in Reading. Reading World, 12 (2) , 136-145.
Redfield, D.L. and Rousseau, E.W. (1981). A Meta Analysis of Experimental Research on Teacher Questioning Behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51 (2), 237-245.
Richards, Jack C. and Nunnan David (1990) . Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, M. (1974). Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables, Their Influence on Language, Logic and Fate Control. Part.1 Wait-Time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11 , 81-94.
Sandres, W.L. and, Horn, S.P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-Model Methodology in Educational Assessment.
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-311 .Sinclair, J.M. and R.M. Coulthard. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University
Press.
Smith, C.T. (1978) Evaluating Answers to Comprehension Questions. The Reading Teacher, 31, PP. 896-900.
Swift, J.N. and Gooding, C.T. (1983). Interaction of Wait Time Feedback and Questioning Instruction on Middle School Science Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 721-730.
Thomas Karl (ed.) (1990). Teacher Development Making the Right Moves. United States Information Agency.
Tollefson, James, W. (1989) . A System for Improving Teachers' Questions. In Thomas Kral (ed .) Teacher Development Making the Right Moves. United States Information Agency. PP. (223-231)
Published
2003-05-26
Section
Articles