Students, Supervisors and Principals as Evaluators: A Western Perspective

  • Amanuel Gebru

Abstract

Evaluations are performed by three parties: students, supervisors and principals' (who often act supervisors) with varying degrees of accountability,
professionalism and evaluative weight accorc!ed. In the Ethiopian school system the evaluation of teachers by students was recently, but controversially introduced. The literature, which aims to provide an international background to evaluation practice in the Ethiopian school system indicates that supervisory evaluations are the most accountable and professional implying the differential weight that should . . be attached. Though students are the principal "consumers" of education, their
evaluative judiciousness is shrouded in some uncertainty. The literature also shows that although teachers generally welcome evaluations, they often have serious
concerns that they may not be objectively, fairly and reliably evaluated, especially when the evaluation is clearly summative. The qualities desired of professional and
ethical evaluators and evaluation systems that can ease such teacher fears are discussed as they relate mainly to primary and secondary school teaching staff.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleamoni, L.M.( 1981}. Student Ratings of Instruction In J. Millman (ed.), .Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverley Hills: Saga Publications.
Andrews, H.( 1995). Teachers Can Be Fired: The Quest for Quality. Chicago: Catfeet Press.
Atsede Beyene (1991). An Investigatien of the Relationship Between Students' Evaluation of Teachers and Evaluation of Teachers By Principals in Ethiopian Teacher Training Institutes. MA Thesis (unpublished).
Bridges, E.M (1990). valuation for Tenure and Dismissal. In J. Millman and L. Darling Hamond,(eds), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation! Assessing Primary and Secondary School Teachers. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Association of School Boards.
Cashin, W.E. (1990) Student Ratings of Teaching: a Summary of the Research: Management Newsletter, 4, 1,2-7.
Centra, J. A. (1979). Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisc:']ossey Bass.
Costin, F. et al (1971). Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity and Usefulness, Review of Educational Research! 41 (5) 511-35.
Elmore P. and 1. Pohlmann (1978). Effect of Teacher, Student and Class Characteristics on the Evaluation of College Instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology. 70(2) 187·192.
Fiddler, B and R. Cooper (1992). Staff Appraisal and Staff Management in schools and Colleges:A Guide to Implementation. -Longman.
Gudridge, B. M. (1980). Teacher Competency: Problems and Solutions: Arlington, va: American ·Association of School Administrators.
Hammond etal, (1983). Teacher Evaluation in the Organizational Context: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research. 53(3) 285-328.
Lazovik, G. (1989). Evaluation of College Teaching-Guidelines for Summative and Formative Procedures. Association of American Colleges, Occasional paper.
Marland, M. (1987). Appraisal and Evaluation Chimera, Fantasy or Practicality in Bunnell, S. (ed.). Teacher Appraisal in Practice. London, Heinemann Educational.
Marsh, C. (1992). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. The Falmer Press.
Mennat, R. P., K. L.Palmer, and E. Hidlebough ( 1976). Evaluating Teacher Performance with Improved Rating Scales. NASSP Bulletin, 60(401), 21-23.
Moxley, R. (1978). Teacher Evaluation. Images and Analysis. Journat of Teacher Education.29 (6) 61-66.
Murgatroyd, S. E C. Morgan, (1992). Total Quality Management and the School. Open University Press ..
Redfern, G. B. (1980). Evaluating Teachers and Administrators: A Performance Objectives Approach. Boulder, Colo.: West Press.
Rotem A. and N. Glasman (1979). On the Effectiveness of Students Evaluative Feedback to UniverSity Instructors. Review of Educational Research. 49(3) 497-511.
Schott, C.l (1989). Improving Training and Evaluation of Teachers at the Secondary School Level. The Edwin Mellen Press. Lampter. Wales.
Stiggins, R.I. and Duke, D. (1988). The Case for Commitment to Teacher Growth. Research on Teacher Education. Albony, State University of New York.
Strike, K. A. (1990). The Ethics of Educational Evaluation. In J. Millinan and L. Darling-Hammond (eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluations: Assessing Elementary and
Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park. CA: Saga Publications.
Styles, G. (1979). The Supervision of Teacher Evaluation. A Brief Overview. Journal of Teacher Education. 30(2) 17-24.
Wise et al. (1985). Teacher Evaluation: A study of Effective Practices. Elementary School Journal.(8)6 61-119.
Published
2017-06-02
Section
Articles