PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF MAIZE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEM AS AFFECTED BY INTERCROPPING DATE OF COMPANION LEGUME CROPS
Abstract
Choosing appropriate legume crops and timing of their establishment is believed to be a relevant management option to minimize
intercrop competition effects on the main crop. A field study was conducted at the experimental site of the Assosa Research Centre, located in western Ethiopia, to determine the production efficiency of maize-based cropping system under different interseeding dates of companion legume crops. The experiment was laid out in two factors randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated three times. The factors employed were four legume crops namely, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), soybean (Glycine max) and two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties (Black Dessie and Awash Melka) intercropped with maize (Zea mays) at three times [simultaneous, four and eight weeks after maize emergence (WAME)] plus sole stand of the respective species. Significant (p≤0.01) effect of legume crops was observed on the total grain yield of the maize, where maize association with Black Dessie variety yielded the highest grain harvest (2.813 t ha -1 ). The effect of intercropping time was, however, non-significant on total grain yield. Computation of the intercrop efficiency revealed that maize and Black Dessie variety complemented each other under intercropping simultaneously and four weeks after maize emergence, indicating that they were not competing for exactly the same ecological niches. Generally, the agronomic measurements and computations of intercrop efficiency affirmed that simultaneous intercropping of maize with Black Dessie variety was remunerative. The economic evaluation, on the other hand, indicated that the net benefit was higher for maize-soybean intercropped simultaneously. This economic performance was not affected under the worst possible input and output price scenarios as shown by the highest marginal rate of return. Hence, farmers stand to gain better when they intercrop maize with soybean or Black Dessie variety than the maize alone.
Downloads
References
Akanvou, R., Kropff, M.J., Bustiaams, L. and Becker, M. (2002). Evaluating the use of two
contrasting legume species as relay intercrop in upland rice cropping system. Field Crop Res. 74: 23-36.
Baldy, C. and Stigter, C.J. (1997). Agrometeorology of Multiple Cropping in Warm Climates. INRA, Paris.
Beets, W.C. (1982). Multiple Cropping and Tropical Farming Systems. Westview Press,Boulder.
Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Cloutier, Q.D., Martin, R.C. and Smith, D.L. (2000). Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Silage yield and quality. Eur. J. Agron. 12: 103-115.
Chemeda Fininsa (1997). Effects of planting pattern, relative planting date and intra-row spacing on a haricot bean/maize intercrop. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 5(1): 15-22.
CIMMYT (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition, Mexico.
EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization) (1999). Distribution of existing research centres by agro-ecological zones. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gbaraneh, L.D., Ikpe, F.N., Larbi, A., Wahua, T.A.T. and Torunana, J.M.A. (2004). The influence of lablab (Lablab purpureus) on grain and fodder yield of maize (Zea mays) in a humid forest region of Nigeria. J. App. Sci. Env. Manag. 8(2): 45-50.
Hiebsch, C.K. and McCollum, R.E. (1987). Area x time equivalency ratio: A method of evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agron. J. 79: 15-22.
Keatings, B.A. and Carberry, P.S. (1993). Resource capture and use in intercropping: Solar radiation. Field Crop Res. 34: 273-301.
Khan, M.B. and Khaliq, A. (2004). Study of mung bean intercropping in cotton planted with different techniques. J. Res. Sci. 15(1): 23-31.
Kleinhenze, V. (1992). Intercropping with Legumes in the Tropics. AVRDC–The World Vegetable Center, Taiwan, 62 pp.
Maluleke, H.M., Ayisi, K.K. and Whitbread, A.M. (2004). Lablab density and planting-date effects on growth and grain yield in maize-lablab intercrops. In: Tropical Legumes for Sustainable Farming Systems in Southern Africa and Australia, pp. 99-105 (Whitbread, A.M. and Pengelly, B.C., eds). ACIAR Proceedings No.115, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra.
Mburu, M.W.K., Mureithi, J.G. and Gachene, C.K.K. (2003). Effects of mucuna planting density and time on water and light use in a maize-legume intercrop system. Legume Res. 9: 2-8.
Morris, R.A. and Garrity, D.P. (1993). Resource capture and utilization in intercropping:Non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crop Res. 34: 319-334.
Mousa, M.A., Mohamed, A., Mohamed, F., Dokashi, M.H. and Elnobi, E.F.E. (2007). Intra-row intercropping of cowpea and cucumber with okra as influenced by planting date of secondary crops. Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. 10(1): 13-32.
Muoneke, C.O., Asiegbu, J.E. and Udeogalanya, A.C.C. (1997). Effect of relative sowing time on the growth and yield of the component crops in okra⁄maize and okra⁄cowpea intercropping systems. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 179: 179-185.
Peoples, M.B. and Craswall, E.T. (1992). Biological nitrogen fixation: Investments,
expectations, and actual contributions to agriculture. Plant Soil 141: 13-39.
Reddy, K.C. and Vissur, P.L. (1997). Cowpea intercrop growth and yield as affected by time of planting relative to millet. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 5: 351-357.
Reddy, M.N. and Chetty, C.K.R. (1984). Staple land equivalent ratio for assessing the yield advantage from intercropping. Exp. Agri. 20: 171-177.
Santalla, M., Rodino, A.P., Casquero, P.A. and de Ron, A.M. (2001). Interactions of bush bean intercropped with field and sweet maize. Eur. J. Agron. 15: 185-196.
Sarkar, R. K., Chakraborty, A. and Bala, B. (1998). Effect of alternative cropping systems on yield and advantage in direct seeded upland rice areas in Indian sub-tropics. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180: 1-6.
Silva, P.I.B, Silva, P.S.L., de Oliveira, O.F. and de Sousa, R.P. (2008). Planting times of co wpea intercropped with corn in the weed control. Caatinga (Mossoró, Brasil),21(1): 113-119 (www.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga) (Accessed on 16th May 2008).
Singh, K.K. and Rathi, K.S. (2003). Dry matter production and productivity as influenced by staggered sowing of mustard intercropped at different row ratios with chickpea.J. Agron. Crop Sci. 189: 169-175.
Sullivan, P. (2003). Intercropping Principles and Production Practices. National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT), ATTRA publication, 135 pp.
Tarawali, G., Dembele, E., N’guessan, B. and Youri, A. (1998). Small holder use of Stylosanthes for sustainable food production in sub humid West Africa. In: Cover Crops in West Africa: Contributing to Sustainable Agriculture, pp. 107-170 IDRC, Ottawa, Canada.
Terao, T., Watanabe, I., Matsunaga, R., Hakoyama, S. and Singh, B.B. (1997). Agrophysiological constraints in intercropped cowpea: An analysis. In: Advances in Cowpea Research, pp. 129-140 (Singh, B.B., Mohan Raj, D.R., Dashiell, K.E. and Jackai, L.E.N., eds.). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Tsubo, M., Walker, S. and Mukhala, E. (2001). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono- and inter cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crop Res.71(1): 17-29.
Willey, R.W. and Rao, M.R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp. Agri. 16: 117-125.
Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. and Erayman, M. (2008). Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turk J. Agric. For. 32: 111-119.
Zentner, R.P., Wall, D.D., Nagy, C.N., Smith, E.G., Young, D.L., Miller, P.R., Campbell, C.A., McConkey, B.G., Brandt, S.A., Lafond, G.P., Johnston, A.M. and Derksen,
D.A. (2002). Economics of crop diversification and soil tillage opportunities in the Canadian prairie. Agron. J. 94: 216-230.
